Holding that (1) non-citizen could not collaterally attack his prior removal order in subsequent illegal reentry criminal proceedings because the conditions prescribed by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) were not met; (2) the lack of date and time in the notice to appear (NTA) did not implicate immigration court’s adjudicatory authority; and (3) the date and time for subsequent removal hearing need not be included in NTA to initiate removal proceedings.
Date of Decision
Case Type
Published
